top of page
Icaros logo (1).png

The future is red

Is Mars Habitable?

  • Writer: Icarus
    Icarus
  • Feb 17
  • 3 min read

I often receive comments like these whenever I write about Mars:


“Mars is not habitable.”

“First we should save Earth before destroying another planet.”

“Radiation alone makes Mars unrealistic.”


High-resolution, rover-style view of the Martian surface showing a vast reddish rocky plain scattered with stones of various sizes, low rolling hills in the distance under a hazy pale-orange sky, and part of a robotic rover’s dusty metallic equipment visible in the foreground.

These concerns are understandable. Mars is harsh. It is hostile and dangerous. But hostile does not mean uninhabitable. And this distinction matters.


No place on Earth was ever “naturally habitable”


Here is the core idea I keep coming back to: No place on Earth is naturally habitable for naked, unassisted humans.


Habitability has never been a property of a place alone. It is something humans create. Fire, clothing, shelter, food storage, agriculture, medicine, social cooperation, these are not luxuries layered on top of a friendly planet. They are the very reason we survived at all.


A winter in the northern hemisphere is lethal without heating, insulation, and stored food. Deserts are deadly without water management and shade. High mountains are unliveable without physiological adaptation. Even today, remove technology from most human settlements and survival becomes a matter of days, not years.


Habitability is always mediated by technology, culture, and social systems. Mars does not break this rule. It simply makes it visible.


Mars is harsh, but humans have always lived in harsh places


Throughout history, humans did not wait for perfect conditions. We adapted.


We learned to live in frozen regions, deserts, high altitudes, and at sea. We reshaped landscapes and, over time, our bodies responded as well. People living at extreme altitudes developed different oxygen-processing systems. Skin pigmentation changed as protection against radiation and sunlight. Entire cultures emerged around survival strategies that once seemed impossible.


Mars represents a continuation of that story, not an exception to it.


Technology for survival already exists


Living on Mars is not easy, but it is not science fiction either.


  • Oxygen can be produced from Martian CO₂.

  • Pressure and temperature do not need to match Earth’s, only human needs inside protected habitats.

  • Closed-loop life-support systems already exist in space stations and submarines.


Radiation is often raised as the ultimate argument against Mars, and it is a serious challenge. But it is a challenge to be managed, not a game stopper. Shielding with regolith, underground habitats, water-based protection, and architectural design are all known strategies. Earth itself contains regions with significantly higher background radiation than average, and people live there. Risk does not disappear, it is mitigated. That has always been the human approach.


Indoor life is not alien to us


One misconception about Mars is that living “inside modules” would be unnatural. But many people already live most of their lives indoors.


I live in Singapore, where large parts of daily life - work, shopping, transport, social spaces - are climate-controlled and interconnected. Moving between sheltered environments is normal. In Nordic countries, Arctic towns, desert cities, or Antarctic research stations, the same logic applies.


You do not need to go to Mars to experience life mediated by infrastructure. Mars simply removes the illusion that the outdoors is always accessible.


Mars will change humans, and that is not new


Long-term life on Mars would almost certainly change the human body.


Lower gravity, different radiation exposure, and closed environments would shape muscle structure, circulation, and development. Children born on Mars would not grow up the same way Earth-born humans did. Returning to Earth might be difficult, or impossible, for some.


This is not a failure of the idea. It is a pattern we have seen before. Humans adapt, and adaptation has consequences.


So, is Mars habitable?


Mars is not naturally habitable. Neither was Earth.


The question is not whether Mars offers comfort, safety, or familiarity. It does not. The real question is whether humans can build habitability there, through technology, cooperation, and long-term adaptation.


From a technical and physiological perspective, I do not see an impossibility. I see a continuation of a very old human story.


The harder question - why we would choose to do this at all - is a different conversation. And it deserves its own space.


Welcome to ICARUS


An emotionally gripping, high-stakes sci-fi epic about survival, rebellion, and the fragile hope of beginning again, not just as individuals, but as a civilization.


📕 Paperback Edition: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FHW3VYJX

💾 Direct EPUB + PDF Download: https://zsoltbugarszki.gumroad.com/l/icarus



Start Reading Now — Explore the First Chapters


Curious to see where it all begins? You can read the opening chapters of Icarus right now:

Comments


bottom of page